Nick Clegg: An end to the duopoly that dominated 20th-century Britain

Friday 17 July 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The duopoly that dominated British politics in the 20th century is dying on its feet. In the 1951 General Election, only 2 per cent of voters chose a party other than Labour or the Conservatives. At the local elections last month, that figure had risen to nearly 40 per cent. The glue that held the duopoly together has disintegrated. Class divides have shifted. Geography no longer maps allegiance. Ideological differences once so important feel immaterial in the post-Cold War world. And because of globalisation and technology – not least the internet – identity has become more fluid and more complex.

People now define themselves in different ways. It's possible for individuals to find multiple homes in an ever-growing number of communities – real and cyber – where people are bound by their interests, principles and experiences, not just by geographical location. At the same time, in our increasingly atomised society, the traditional mass-membership parties no longer speak to people.

So you can't bank on someone's support because of where they were born, or how their parents voted. You have to earn their support; you have to prove yourself. That breakdown has created opportunities for real change in British politics; moments in which the Establishment has been extremely vulnerable. The first was in the early 1980s, when the alliance came tantalizingly close to breaking the mould in British politics. The second was in 1997, when the whole country turned its back on 18 years of Conservative rule.

The third is now. And in the battle of ideas the Liberal Democrats are winning. The first party to identify the dangers of an overleveraged banking system. The first to advocate radical political reform. Consistent in our defence of civil liberties. Principled in our defence of the international rule of law. Outspoken in correcting our woefully imbalanced tax system. Radical on the need to make Britain environmentally sustainable. Brave in standing up to failed populism on law and order. Determined to use childcare and education policies to break cycles of deprivation handed down from one generation to the next.

From the Liberal Democrat leader's speech to the National Liberal Club, marking the 150th anniversary of the first Parliamentary Liberal Party caucus

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in