Michael Petry: Assistants were always used by the greats
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Most artists neither grind their own pigments nor make the canvas they use. The notion of the studio and assistants goes back hundreds of years.
The 17th-century sculptor Bernini had most of his marble statues carved by assistants who only used his small models – including his Apollo and Daphne (1622-25), which was carved by Giuliano Finelli. They fell out over Finelli's lack of credit in its production.
Rembrandt and Joshua Reynolds (founder of the Royal Academy) also had assistants paint large parts of many of their works. More recently, Hepworth and Moore bronzes were made by foundry workers from small models, hardly any different from Damien Hirst and his bronzes. Hirst is happy to hand over an object to be made on a massive scale. Like other artists, he is unlikely to credit his assistants. But in the end, the artwork is still his.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments