Mary Dejevsky: A fiasco that shows British diplomacy is clapped out

Comment

Saturday 31 October 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If, as it appears, yesterday's EU summit spelled the end of Tony Blair's undeclared ambition to be the first President of Europe, you have to ask whether he really wanted the job at all. So clumsy and ill-prepared was the campaign that, with hindsight, it almost looks like a manoeuvre to exclude him – and clear the way for David Miliband to bid for the post of High Representative.

But the failure is not cost-free to Britain; the wreckage left behind is considerable. It is not just in the arcane world of EU diplomacy, but in the diplomatic world generally, that the cardinal rule is to ensure the invitation will be accepted before you send it. Neither as a nation, nor as a minister, do you put your head above the parapet until you are pretty sure of a favourable reception. You quietly check the lie of the land; you sound out trusted intermediaries; you do nothing that would risk losing face.

Now, this is exactly what has happened. Tony Blair might not actually have stood on his soapbox, but he did absolutely nothing to stop his bandwagon once it started. Why it started when it did remains a mystery. But the far greater mystery is why on earth the Foreign Secretary and then the Prime Minister came out to lobby so enthusiastically and publicly on Mr Blair's behalf, even before the Lisbon Treaty was ratified.

It would not have been hard to discover that opinion within individual EU states was, to put it mildly, unconvinced by the merits of Mr Blair. Most journalistic outlets teased this out days in advance. Why did Britain's diplomats in Brussels not pass the message to London – or, if they did, why were they ignored?

The conspiratorial explanation might be that the Foreign Office saw its interests as being better served by Mr Miliband remaining in the contest for High Representative, than by Mr Blair becoming President, and tailored its efforts to that end. But there are other possibilities.

One would look like a sad repeat of the doomed Second Resolution at the UN, when the Government's one-track thinking on going to war with Iraq led it to underestimate opposition at the UN. Or could it simply be that, even after 12 years in office, this Government still hasn't figured out how Brussels really works? Either way, the diplomatic machine once described as a Rolls Royce looks closer this week than last to qualifying for scrappage.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in