Kim Sengupta: These attacks could serve as a catalyst for war

There is a perception that the Israelis must carry out any attacks before the US elections

Kim Sengupta
Wednesday 15 February 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The bombings have already become remarkable for their rapid frequency: in Delhi, in Tbilisi and now in Bangkok. The perpetrators, we are told, were Iranians and their allies, Hezbollah. The targets: Israelis.

If all true, this is a dangerous moment in a scenario already incendiary due to the confrontation between Israel and the West and Iran over its nuclear programme.

At the Herzliyah security conference in Israel this month one got the impression that the hierarchy in Israel was divided on military strikes. Senior officers in the military were cautious while some politicians were eager to put others' sons in harm's way.

Part of the debate was about timing. The sanctions imposed by the EU and the US, including the most potent, an oil embargo, do not come fully into play until the summer. After that it will take a few months to gauge the effects. Yet, at the same time, there is a perception the Israelis must carry out any attacks before the US elections in November, during a period when Barack Obama would find it difficult not to back Benjamin Netanyahu's government. The Defence Minister, Ehud Barak, keeps warning about Iran reaching a "zone of immunity" after which it would be much more difficult to destroy its nuclear capabilities.

The latest bombings have undoubtedly strengthened the hands of the hawks in Tel Aviv. Their view is that sanctions are no longer the only argument and the time factor has become less material and along with the danger of nuclear war, Iran and its allies are embarking on a terrorist war against the Jewish state.

Israel can retaliate with "unofficial war". But that would be nothing new – up to six scientists involved with the nuclear programme have already been assassinated inside Iran. Hezbollah, too, has suffered from the long reach of Mossad.

Could continuing bombings be the trigger for strikes against Iran? The murder in 1982 of the Israeli ambassador to the UK by a Palestinian faction led to full-scale war against the PLO in Lebanon when the political landscape in the region was less febrile than it is now.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in