Fred Pearce: A closure that won't help the environment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The skids are under the nuclear industry. The big recycling plant at Sellafield is to shut down because its only customers, Japanese nuclear power stations, are closing following the Fukushima accident. Good riddance? Not so fast. Ask this: should we fear nuclear power more than climate change?
I grew up hating nuclear power. For four reasons. It looked unsafe in operation; its waste disposal problems looked even scarier; it was, whatever our masters claimed, linked to nuclear weapons; and I didn't want the kind of surveillance state that keeping nuclear fuel safe required.
Now the nuclear landscape looks different. Safety is better: even the multiple layers of incompetence and bad luck visited on the clapped-out Fukushima plant won't end up killing many people. Radioactive waste is more containable than the carbon emissions from coal and gas that are sending our climate haywire. The end of the Cold War has reduced our angst about nuclear weapons. And the surveillance state? Well, thanks to the war on terror, we've lost that battle.
However many roofs we cover in solar panels and hills with wind turbines, less nuclear means more coal and more climate change. That's what I fear now.
Fred Pearce is an author and environment consultant at 'New Scientist' magazine
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments