Dr Paul Chambers: Future is dark unless both sides are prepared for reconciliation

Friday 21 May 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Not since the military's massacre of students in 1976 has Thailand been so fractured. That massacre – a still sensitive topic from the country's coup-littered recent history – was part of a crackdown on left-wing students amid fears of a Communist takeover. Now the opposing forces stand divided over one man, the ousted prime minister Thaksin Shinawtra, and his populist policies.

On one side stands the ruling parliamentary coalition, the leading military faction, the King's Privy Council, and anti-Thaksin groups. On the other is the opposition coalition, disgruntled junior and retired military officers sidelined by the dominant military faction, and the Red Shirts' "People's Army," which includes multitudes of rural poor ideologically awakened by Thaksin's populism.

From March to May, the Red Shirts showed they were a force to be reckoned with by standing their ground in sometimes violent demonstrations against the government. The pressure undoubtedly compelled the Prime Minister, Abhisit Vejjajiva, to compromise with the proposal of an early election in November. The refusal of the Red Shirt leaders to unconditionally accept this offer was the last straw for the government and military, which prepared for the crackdown.

It was a brutal end. Last week there were calls from some to bring in the United Nations to resolve the conflict – a proposal not taken up by the Abhisit government. Any UN intervention might only have led to the conclusion that Thailand had degenerated into some kind of shadow state, where its ability to control the situation were gravely in doubt.

The implications of the crackdown are not encouraging. While the demonstrations in Bangkok were quelled, uprisings are accelerating in other parts of the country. Such volatility suggests that Thailand could have a civil war. The only institution which has grown in power during this deadlock is the military, thus, Thailand will most certainly see the expanded political role of the armed forces. The importance of the pro- or anti-Thaksin mobs will grow. And finally democracy may well erode in Thailand as elected government becomes a side issue to the growing importance of mobs and soldiers.

Thailand is entering a dangerous period. Each side is bracing itself as the reign of the ailing monarch – who has brought stability to the country through dangerous times – comes close to an end. Unless each side starts to make serious overtures toward reconciliation, the country's immediate future may be dark.

Dr Paul Chambers is a senior research fellow specialising in Thailand's armed forces at Heidelberg University, Germany

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in