David Prosser: So, how much is the company really worth?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The short answer is as much as a buyer is prepared to pay for it. But whether the £418m that News Corp paid for the television production company represented good value is another question.
Still, businesses do not simply pluck numbers out of the air when making an acquisition. Valuing a company is an art as well as a science, but there are some basic principles to follow.
Even quite a young company will have figures showing its past earnings. The price-to-earnings ratio (the value of a business divided by its annual profits) is the most common way in which to calculate a company's worth. Similar companies should trade on similar ratios.
Britain's independent television production sector is not big enough to have seen a string of deals against which to judge the acquisition of Shine. But there is one transaction to which News Corp's angry shareholders might point. Last year, Time Warner took a controlling stake in Shed Media, the producer of Waterloo Road and Supernanny, in a deal that valued the company at £100m. Shed was on target to make a profit of around £12m last year, giving a price-to-earnings multiple of just over eight.
By contrast, Shine made a profit of £5.5m in 2009, the last year for which figures are available. Sales accelerated last year, but even if we charitably say that profits might have hit £10m, the News Corp purchase puts the deal on a price-to-earnings ratio of more than 40. So, a clear case of nepotism? Not necessarily. There may be all sorts of explanations for such discrepancies – different growth prospects, the quality of key staff and a changing economic environment. Still, it will be tough to argue it was cheap.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments