Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Yeltsin ally wants election postponed

Phil Reeves Moscow
Sunday 05 May 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of Boris Yeltsin's closest advisers last night warned that Russia could be plunged into violence unless it postpones the forthcoming presidential election, reinforcing speculation that the Kremlin is manoeuvring to call off the contest for fear the President will be thrown out.

Alexander Korzhakov, head of the presidential security service, one of the most powerful men in Mr Yeltsin's inner circle, said more time was needed to allow people to "think calmly", warning that there were "entire regions" in Russia where the "civilised expression of people's will" is impossible. The first round of the election is scheduled for 16 June.

Although he said his remarks were personal, they will be seen as reflecting a broader view in the Kremlin that the elections cannot go ahead because of the risk Mr Yeltsin may lose to the Communist front-runner, Gennady Zyuganov.

"It is inadmissible that Russians again fight Russians," General Korzhakov told the Russian agency, Interfax, "The society is splitting ... the division of souls is dangerous." He urged executives, parliamentary officials and leaders of political parties to take heed.

His remarks follow speculation that the elections may be called off. Just over a week ago, 13 prominent industrialists and bankers published a letter in Russian newspapers calling for the leading political rivals to reach a compromise before a conflict erupted. Mr Zyuganov yesterday told Pravda that Mr Yeltsin's entourage was ready to deny the population their right to vote, but that "people will not put up with this".

There is no doubt many in the Yeltsin administration fear defeat, as they would lose jobs and face prosecution for illegally cashing in on the privatisation process. But postponing the election without the agreement of the Communists would be a huge risk.

Much of the Russian military is already demoralised and disillusioned by the President's handling of the Chechen war. While the 25,000 presidential guards under Mr Khorzhakov's command may defend the Kremlin in the event of unrest, the loyalty of the military is not a foregone conclusion.

General Korzhakov's remarks may have been intended to bolster rumours that the Communists are privately willing to do a deal with the Kremlin in return for policy changes and key posts. On the face of it, the scenario seems unlikely.

The Communists stand a good chance of winning outright. They know hostility to Mr Yeltsin in the regions is huge, and that he lags in the polls. Yet they also know the President controls much of the media, which is showing bias in its coverage, and is pouring money into deprived areas to win votes. In recent weeks, he appears to have narrowed their lead.

In spite of General Korzhakov's wishes, the odds are that the vote will go ahead, as Mr Yeltsin has promised, with a first round in June and a final round in July. A more compelling issue is what will Mr Yeltsin do if the result goes against him. If he loses by a small margin, he would have little difficulty massaging the vote.

It is widely accepted that his administration cooked the vote in the 1993 referendum on the constitution. But a large deficit would be difficult to fix. What would then happen is anybody's guess.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in