Weld shuns Republican nomination
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A dull radical entered the race for the Republican presidential nomination yesterday 24 hours after an interesting moderate said he would not be taking part.
Lamar Alexander, a former governor of Tennessee, announced that he would seek to persuade the Republican Party that he is the man to defeat President Bill Clinton in November 1996. William Weld, the governor of Massachussets, killed off speculation he would run.
Mr Weld explained that he did not wish to become "an absentee father" to his five teenagechildren but he perhaps also judged that the times called for a man more radical than he.
Mr Weld is a fiscal conservative who favours the death penalty but is also a thoughtful New England patrician who reads Yeats in his spare time and favours gay and abortion rights - the kiss of death among the Republican faithful.
Mr Alexander, by contrast, is the bluff "family values" type. Yesterday, in an open-necked check shirt flanked by his wife and four children outside the courthouse in Blunt Co, Tennessee, he said he wanted to become President to set about a "people's revolution".
What Mr Alexander has in mind is shifting $200bn (£130bn) of federal money to the states and reducing congress in Washington to a part-time institution.
Every Republican is in favour of "downsizing" Washington these days but none is more zealous than Mr Alexander. What he most lacks is presentation skills. "In terms of making the charisma meter tick we need to do some work," one of his campaign team admitted last week.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments