US representative to the UN claims Russia's vetoes 'jeopardise' security council's effectiveness
Samantha Power claimed should the council cease to be effective, countries would 'go elsewhere'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The United States has warned Russia’s continued use of its UN veto could render the security council ineffective, as the international institution saw in its 70th anniversary.
A US representative claimed continued vetoing could lead America – and other like-minded countries – to bypass the institution entirely, the Guardian reported.
Samantha Power, the US permanent representative to the UN, said international security was a “Darwinian universe” whereby nations “are going to go elsewhere” should a “particular body reveals itself to be dysfunctional”.
Ms Power’s comments come amid the UN’s paralysis over intervention in Syria’s four year civil war. More than 250,000 people are believed to have died in the conflict, with 11 million displaced.
“And if that happened for more than Syria and Ukraine and you started to see across the board paralysis ... it would certainly jeopardise the security council’s status and credibility and its function as a go-to international security arbiter.”
Russia has vetoed 13 votes since it took over the Soviet seat in 1991, a lower figure than the US who vetoed 14 votes, usually in regards to Israel and the Palestinian question, in the same period.
The UN representative for Russia Vitaly Churkin claims his country’s veto is to prevent the council from being used to dictate regime changes.
Mr Churkin told the Guardian “Some countries were trying to involve the security council in regime change operations in Syria and we were telling them that it’s not the business of the security council to go into regime change mode”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments