US denounces Haiti's puppet president
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PRESIDENT Bill Clinton's administration last night dismissed the appointment of a new pro-military puppet president in Haiti as illegitimate, and several Democratic members of Congress said a credible US military force might be needed to restore democracy to the Caribbean country.
A State Department spokesman said the army-backed installation of Supreme Court Justice Emil Jonassaint was 'purely illegitimate to begin with' and will have no impact on US efforts to restore elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide to power.
Despite those statements, the Clinton administration continued to send conflicting signals on the possible despatch of US troops to help restore democracy in Haiti. Quoting unnamed diplomats and Haitian officials, the Los Angeles Times had reported that Washington planned to send 'at least 600' heavily armed troops to the island to 'purge' the Haitian army, whether or not the current regime of General Raoul Cedras surrenders power.
The claim was immediately rejected by the White House. Spokeswoman Dee Dee Myers acknowledged that President Bill Clinton had not ruled out the use of force, 'but I can't imagine sending in some kind of people to achieve a mission like that'. At the Pentagon, the Defense Secretary, William Perry, was said to be 'perplexed' by the report.
But earlier, Madeleine Albright, the UN ambassador, did not specifically deny the report, admitting the administration was examining various contingency plans. Even if the threatened UN sanctions did bring down the military regime, some kind of outside force would be needed to keep order and help with rebuilding the country, she said.
The charitable explanation put on the varying versions was that the US was seeking to keep General Cedras and his colleagues off balance; the less kindly was that they were further evidence of indecision and confusion in administration foreign policy making.
If the US forces were technically under the UN umbrella, the reported plan could comply with last year's Governor's Island agreement in New York whereby a UN military and police force would go to Haiti following the return of exiled President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. The latest UN measure calls for a tight economic embargo on Haiti from 21 May if General Cedras has not stepped down.
But yesterday brought scant sign he would do so. Guarded by well-armed Haitian troops, right-wing members of Haiti's parliament apparently installed the 81-year-old Mr Jonassaint as the new President, replacing the democratically elected Fr Aristide.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments