UN detainees 'denied rights'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MOGADISHU - Amnesty International has a job to do here, writes Richard Dowden.
Seventy or more prisoners are being held in detention without charge, without access to lawyers or to their families and with no legal rights. Conditions are said to be grim. But they are not being held by some African dictatorship with an appalling human rights record. They are being held by the United Nations.
According to the UN there are 70 Somalis being held after successive raids since the end of June by UN forces and the United States quick-reaction force. They are being held in preventative detention pending investigation into suspicion of involvement in attacks on the UN. The UN says they are 'being treated humanely under international rules. . . '
However, the International Committee of the Red Cross had difficulty in persuading the UN to allow access to them. The Red Cross says there are 73 prisoners, not 70, and it is still trying to establish on what grounds they are being held and to secure their internationally recognised legal and familial rights. Officially they are allowed familial visits 'except for reasons of security'. But no one at the UN knows of any visits that have taken place.
Yesterday, on behalf of a Somali, I asked the provost marshal, a Bangladeshi major who is responsible for security in the UN camp, if the Somali could visit his brother and was told 'absolutely not'. Asked on what basis the detainees were being held, Farouk Mawlawi, the UN spokesman, said it was a matter for the UN legal officer. The UN legal officer, a Nigerian lawyer, has been ordered by UN headquarters in New York not to talk to the press.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments