Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

TV execution ruling

Rupert Cornwell
Tuesday 14 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court last night was expected to rule on requests by convicted killer David Lawson to have his execution in a North Carolina gas chamber halted - or that if it went ahead, it should be televised by a leading US talk show programme, writes Rupert Cornwell.

Lawson, 38, convicted of murder during a 1980 robbery, was due to die at 2am today. But his lawyers filed a last-ditch plea for a stay, which the nine Justices, who were not in formal session yesterday, were to consider in a conference call.

A few hours earlier in a taped special edition of the Phil Donahue show, Lawson apologised to the family of his victim, Wayne Shinn. Shinn's relatives, who planned to attend the execution, brushed aside the apology. They dismissed as a publicity stunt Lawson's request for Donahue to film his death.

Lawson said the presence of cameras would give meaning to his life. But the director of Raleigh's Central Prison, as well as two lower courts, rejected his request. The Supreme Court was not expected to reverse the ruling.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in