Thai crimes endanger Saudi ties
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FACED with Saudi Arabian anger over incidents that have bedevilled bilateral relations, Thailand is resorting to explanations as bizarre as the incidents themselves, writes Raymond Whitaker.
The Saudis are upset over the murder of four of their officials in Bangkok in 1989 and 1990, the subsequent disappearance and probable killing of a Saudi businessman and the theft of jewellery from a prince's household by a Thai servant, not to mention the return of fake jewels by the police. What has driven them close to apoplexy, however, is the unwillingness or inability of the Thai authorities to clear up these matters.
According to press reports, the Saudi charge d'affaires in Bangkok, Mohammed Said Khoja, has threatened to recommend to his government that the embassy be closed. Riyadh has already begun refusing visas to all Thais except Muslims on pilgrimages to Mecca.
Observers believe, that the killings, as well as the disappearance of the Saudi businessman, were connected with the lucrative recruitment trade. At the time there were 100,000 Thais working in Saudi Arabia, many of whom had paid large sums to recruitment agencies.
This week the Prime Minister, Chuan Leekpai, said it might have to admit suspects for the killings could not be found. But yesterday the Interior Ministry came up with a new explanation: terrorists were responsible after all, though without offering evidence.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments