Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Senate defies Clinton by voting to end arms ban

BOSNIA CRISIS: US DISARRAY

Rupert Cornwell
Wednesday 26 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Senate last night delivered President Bill Clinton a stinging foreign policy rebuke with a clear, bipartisan vote to lift the existing UN arms embargo on Bosnia, defying a torrent of warnings from the administration that the step would only suck America deeper into the Balkan quagmire.

The measure, sponsored by Bob Dole, the Republican majority leader, and Joseph Lieberman, a Democrat, was approved on a vote of 69 to 29, two votes more than the two-thirds majority required to override a certain veto from Mr Clinton.

Mr Clinton's press secretary, Mike McCurry, said Congress would bear the responsibility for a "dreadful decision" if the resolution became law.

Long beforehand, however, it was clear the amendment had support across a wide spectrum, embracing virtually every Republican and many Democrats from both the liberal and moderate wings of the party. For every one of them, the common denominator is frustration at the West's inability either to halt the fighting or properly to protect the Muslim enclaves.

"This is not a partisan discussion," Mr Dole said. "It's about whether some small country that's been ravaged on all sides, pillaged, women raped, children killed, has any rights in this world." Implementation of the measure, however, would automatically provoke a pull-out by Britain and France of their peace-keeping contingents from Bosnia.

The bitter mood has only intensified since the international conference in London last Friday. The meeting was advertised as a show of determination by the allies but it patently failed to resolve the differences between them.

"The intended roar has turned into just a growl," said Frank Lautenberg, a Democrat.

Faced with what would be a resounding vote of no confidence in its conduct of foreign policy, the White House had retreated into acceptance of the inevitable, hoping that at least 34 of the 100 senators, the minimum needed to sustain a presidential veto, would vote against lifting the embargo.

But Mr Dole, the prime architect of the "Bosnia Self- Defence Amendment", tailored the wording to command the widest support. The embargo would only be removed after the withdrawal of the peace-keeping force - estimated by the Pentagon to take up to 22 weeks - or 12 weeks after a formal request from the Sarajevo government. Furthermore, Mr Clinton would be able to order further 30-day delays if he considered them necessary.

In vain have the President and his top advisers, including the Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, and the Defense Secretary, William Perry, warned that the demise of the embargo might only "Americanise" the conflict, trigger a renewed Serb offensive and intensify the fighting. Mr Dole's withering reply on the Senate floor was simply: "I thought there was fighting already.''

The vote may make little practical difference in the short term. The House of Representatives, where feeling against the embargo is, if anything, stronger than in the Senate, must pass a similar measure. Nothing would arrive on the President's desk until tomorrow, and both sides are already hinting they are prepared to work towards a compromise more acceptable to the European allies.

But there is no disguising the blow to Mr Clinton. Worst of all, the vote brings closer what he most wants to avoid: the involvement of US ground forces in Bosnia. To help to extricate the UN contingent, Washington has promised 25,000 US troops.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in