Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Protests throw Juppe off balance

Mary Dejevsky
Wednesday 29 November 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

With much of the country's transport at a standstill, schools closed, many universities on strike and postal and other services crippled for the second time in a week, the French government yesterday held a series of emergency meetings to consider its response to a wave of unrest for which it was largely unprepared.

The protests, which have a variety of causes, have coalesced against the plans of the Prime Minister, Alain Juppe, to reform the health and social security system, and attained a strength that has surprised even the most militant of trade union leaders.

Yesterday's day of protest was called by France's second-largest union, the Force Ouvriere, as a direct response to the social security reforms, and involved mainly public sector workers objecting to likely cuts in their pension rights. It followed the nationwide strikes and demonstrations called last Friday by France's six other large unions, and a national student protest a week ago.

Yesterday, members of other unions, including the CGT, with members concentrated in France Telecom and other public services, joined the FO in strikes and street protests, and helped to swell the planned march through the Latin Quarter of Paris to more than 40,000. What remained of severely curtailed public transport was brought to a halt.

While this march was slightly less well supported than Friday's turnout of up to 50,000 in Paris and thousands more in other big cities, yesterday was the first real working day to be affected by strike action - on Friday, many people simply took the day off and began their weekend early - and the disruption was considerable.

With almost no suburban trains running and the national railways on strike for the fifth day running (over a restructuring plan), queues of 30 to 40km built up on many approach roads to Paris. The inner ring road was completely blocked from 7.30am.

One bus company set up services between Paris and some large cities, including Lyon and Bordeaux, an unusual initiative in a country where long-distance buses are few and far between. Cross-channel ferry services were again disrupted as French crews on the Calais-Dover route went on strike.

So far, government ministers have made no specific comment on the protests, stressing only their determination to proceed with the planned reforms. Yesterday the government spokesman, Alain Lamassoure, said that it was "out of the question for the government to retreat". "The desire for reform, its orientation and timetable", he said, "were unalterable".

The only slight chink in the government's armour was a clearly authorised offer from the Transport Minister, Bernard Pons, to the railwaymen, promising an additional grant to repay a proportion of the railway's accumulated debt next year. As the railwaymen's representatives began another round of talks with managers last night, however, they professed themselves unimpressed by the offer and were already planning further strikes for today.

While the government's attitude to the widespread stoppages appears to be to do nothing, a decision to wait and see need not necessarily be a sign of confusion. It could be a reasonable policy option. As Franz-Olivier Giesbert, editorial director of the pro-Chirac Figaro daily said yesterday, the government's position, and Mr Juppe's own, may not be as weak as it seems at first sight.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in