US forces nations to help its citizens avoid international court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Forty-three of the world's poorest nations have caved in to American pressure and signed agreements not to send US citizens for trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC), which was set up last year to hear allegations of crimes against humanity.
Governments that continue to defy America after its deadline expires tomorrow risk losing US military support and economic aid. Washington, which has forces deployed in more than 140 countries, is vehemently opposed to the ICC, arguing that US soldiers, officials and citizens will become targets for political reasons.
Although President Bill Clinton signed the treaty establishing the ICC, he was not able to persuade Congress to ratify it and President George Bush later rescinded his predecessor's signature.
A report published by Amnesty International shows that most of the 43 states that have already signed bilateral immunity treaties are heavily indebted to the United States.
Albania, Bolivia and Afghanistan are reliant on America for their military aid. Others, such as Tongo and the Marshall Islands, are dependent on trade with the US.
Critics of the American policy towards the ICC argue that the bilateral agreements will undermine the authority of the world's first permanent tribunal for hearing allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Amnesty International says that many countries have come under intense US pressure to sign bilateral agreements.
Amnesty's media director, Lesley Warner, said: "Less than 10 years after the horrific genocide in Rwanda and Bosnia- Herzegovina, the new International Criminal Court, which starts its second year tomorrow, offers great hope. That hope is that crimes committed on such a scale will increasingly be confined to the past and where they do occur justice will be done."
"The Court enjoys enormous support from the international community," Ms Warner said.
The court is authorised to deal with crimes committed after 1 July 2002, provided that either the accused are citizens of a country that has ratified the court's statute, or the alleged crimes were committed on the territory of a ratifying country.
BOWING TO THE US
Afghanistan
Albania
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia-Herzegovinia
Cambodia
Democratic Republic of Congo
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Egypt
El Salvador
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Ghana
Honduras
India
Madagascar
Maldives
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Micronesia
Mongolia
Nauru
Nepal
Nicaragua
Palua
Philippines
Romania
Rwanda
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Sri Lanka
Tajikistan
Thailand
Togo
Tonga
Tunisia
Tuvalu
Uzbekistan
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments