UN food summit ends in failure as delegates fudge final declaration
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UN's food crisis summit lurched to a messy end in Rome yesterday as brave hopes failed to translate into convincing commitments to tackle the soaring threat of world hunger.
A final declaration was only agreed after hours of bickering over the language. And the final text failed to disguise dramatic differences over the cause of price inflation and its cure.
The International Food Policy Research Institute, in testimony to the American Senate, has said biofuels are responsible for 30 per cent of the rise in food prices. But the summit's declaration, under pressure from the US, spoke only of the need "to address the challenges and opportunities posed by biofuels" and to undertake "in-depth studies".
The declaration, like many speakers at the summit, paid lip service to devoting more attention to the unglamorous millions toiling in Africa and Asia. "Maintaining biodiversity" and support for "the world's smallholder farmers and fishers, including indigenous people, in particular in vulnerable areas" were among the aims agreed on.
But so was the commitment to "continue... efforts in liberalising international trade in agriculture by reducing trade barriers" – at a time when the forced opening of markets to food imports is blamed by many in the developing world for the destruction of indigenous farming.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments