Yemeni civil war: Two charts show why UK should pay attention to the ongoing conflict's anniversary
UK taxpayers funding aid for civilian victims as the government issues licences for the sale of arms to Saudi Arabia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The link between the death toll in Yemen and the sale of arms by British companies to Saudi Arabia can be seen in two new charts produced exclusively for The Independent.
As the conflict enters its third year one shows that the UK has licensed an estimated £3.3bn in arms sales to the oil rich Middle Eastern kingdom since it began.
In the same period, a second chart indicated that 4,773 civilians have been killed and 8,272 injured. Both were compiled by Statista.
Human rights activists have also claimed that 17 million people have been made food insecure in the two year conflict.
As a result, the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), which has mounted a judicial review in court aiming to halt all UK arms sales, is once again calling on Theresa May’s government to work on a ceasefire.
“For two years now, Saudi forces have unleashed a brutal humanitarian catastrophe on the people of Yemen,” said the group's spokesman, Andrew Smith. “The response from Whitehall has been to keep arming and supporting the Saudi regime, irrespective of the destruction it has caused.
“Ten thousand people have been killed, yet the message being sent out is that their lives are less important than profits for arms companies.”
CAAT estimate the British government has licensed £2.2bn in ML10 licences for aircrafts, helicopters and drones, £1.1bn in ML4 licences for grenades, bombs, missiles and countermeasures, and £430,000 in ML6 licences for armoured vehicles and tanks.
“We are always being told that the UK enjoys a strong influence over Saudi Arabia,” added Mr Smith. “If that is true then it needs to use it to call and work for a meaningful and lasting ceasefire. It must also end its own complicity and stop the arms sales.
“Forging lasting peace from a conflict zone is never easy, but as long as governments like the UK continue to prioritise arms company interests then it will be civilians who pay the price.”
While the Conservative-led government continues to supply arms to Saudi, it says it has committed £85m in aid, making it the fourth largest donor to the humanitarian crisis.
It claims to be providing vital medical supplies, water, food and nutrition and emergency shelter to more than 1.3 million Yemenis.
But it means UK taxpayers are, paradoxically, funding support to Yemeni victims while simultaneously supporting the Saudis bombing campaign' against them.
The Saudi government has admitted it using UK-manufactured cluster bombs against Houthi rebels, while Britain’s foreign office admits that British made Typhoon jet fighters have been used in Yemen.
“The UK is giving a fraction in aid of what it is giving in weapons,” added Mr Smith.
A Foreign and Commonwealth Office spokesman said the UK is “not a member of the Saudi Arabian-led coalition” but that it does support it.
It added: “We continue to urge all parties to the conflict to take all reasonable steps to allow and facilitate rapid and safe humanitarian access, and to take all feasible precautions to avoid harming civilians and civilian infrastructure.”
The Independent has contacted the House of Saud for comment
A verdict on CAAT's judicial review was scheduled for some time over the spring.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments