Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UN negotiator apologises for deadlocked Syrian peace talks

Lakhdar Brahimi says he is 'very, very sorry' and wanted to 'apologise to the Syrian people'

Chris Stevenson
Sunday 16 February 2014 01:00 GMT
Comments
N-Arab League Special Envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi during a press conference
N-Arab League Special Envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi during a press conference

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UN mediator in the Syrian peace talks cut a frustrated figure yesterday as discussions between the government and opposition groups ended in deadlock.

Lakhdar Brahimi said he was "very, very sorry" and wanted to "apologise to the Syrian people" after the end of the meeting in Geneva - admitting that the talks "had not come out with very much".

Despite agreeing an agenda for a third round of talks - focusing on ending the violence and terrorism, creating a transitional governing body, building national institutions, and reconciliation - Bashar al-Assad's government has refused to discuss the idea of a transitional body until it believes the issue of combating terrorism has been dealt with - meaning that no date has been set for the talks.

"I have suggested that it's not good for the process, it's not good for Syria that we come back for another round and fall into the same trap that we have been struggling with this week and most of the first round," Mr Brahimi said. "So I think it is better that every side goes back and reflects: do they want this process to take place or not?"

William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, has expressed his concerns over the lack of progress. "The failure to agree an agenda for future rounds of talks... is a serious setback in the search for peace in Syria, and the responsibility for it lies squarely with the Assad regime," he said. "This cannot be the end of the road.... We owe it to the people of Syria to do all we can to make progress towards a political solution."


Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in