Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sharon orders an 'intense response' to bus bombing

Atrocity shatters any remaining hope of Labour leader persuading voters to give peace one more chance

Eric Silver
Friday 22 November 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister, ordered the army to carry out a "wide and extensive operation" in response to the suicide bombing of a bus in Jerusalem yesterday morning that killed 11 commuters and schoolchildren.

Mr Sharon's spokesman, Raanan Gissin, predicted a "long and intensified campaign" in the Bethlehem area, where the 23-year-old Hamas bomber had come from. He told The Independent: "The leaders of Hamas will be hard pressed to find a safe place to hide or a safe place to sleep in."

Mr Gissin stressed that Israel would not be provoked into the kind of massive retaliation that would jeopardise President George Bush's campaign against Saddam Hussein in Iraq. "The only thing that guides Mr Sharon is how to bring down the level of terrorism," he said.

The bombing, the first in Jerusalem in three months, came barely 36 hours after the opposition Labour party chose the dovish former general Amram Mitzna as its standard-bearer for the 28 January general election. Welcoming Mr Mitzna's victory in Tuesday's primary, the Palestinian leader, Yasser Arafat, took care to say that he was not interfering in Israel's internal politics. Hamas, it seems, had no such scruples. Yesterday's atrocity strikes a devastating blow to Mr Mitzna's chances of persuading an already sceptical public to give peace one more chance.

Labour has been there before. After Yitzhak Rabin's assassination by a Jewish extremist in November 1995, his successor, Shimon Peres, looked likely to win the general elections. But a season of Hamas bombings in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and the southern port city of Ashkelon in early 1996 tilted the balance to the right-wing Likud party's Binyamin Netanyahu.

Support for Mr Peres, the Nobel peace prize-winning architect of the 1993 Oslo accords, swung from 59 per cent immediately after he took over as acting prime minister to a tiny margin for Mr Netanyahu by polling day at the end of May. Mr Peres had no doubt that Hamas had brought the right back to power.

Hamas's bellicose statements after yesterday's bombing, its repudiation of any ceasefire and its pledge to "make life hell" for Israelis, suggest that it knew what it was doing. A perpetuation of Mr Sharon's mailed-fist policies and boycott of Mr Arafat is exactly what Hamas needs to fuel its campaign against Israel.

Mr Mitzna cannot change his platform – an immediate resumption of negotiations with Mr Arafat, evacuation of the Gaza Strip, a readiness for substantial West Bank withdrawals – even if he wanted to. He would lose all credibility if he changed tack now.

Hanoch Smith, a veteran pollster, summed it up: "Mitzna didn't have too wonderful a chance even without the bombing. I don't think one bombing changes anything, but if there's a whole series during the election campaign, it's going to be even harder. Sharon's in a win-win situation. If the bombings stop, he can say 'we tamed them'. If they go on, he can say 'we're hitting the terrorists'."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in