Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Saddam Hussein's deputy says Iraq expects to be bombed

Matthew Beard
Monday 29 October 2001 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Iraq expects to be bombed by the West but warned that an attack would be a "grave mistake" as it would destroy the coalition against terrorism.

Speaking for the first time since 11 September, Tariq Aziz, Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister, said Baghdad was aware of plans to strike 300 targets with 1,000 missiles. Mr Aziz, who is second-in-command to President Saddam Hussein, said: "We know that it is just a matter of time before such an attack. That is going to be a very grave mistake. The Arab world is not going to tolerate that ... they know that this is unjust and is sheer aggression."

He said such action would destroy the Allied coalition. He said: "There won't be Arab military retaliation. Political actions and stances will be taken by the Arabs which will add to the isolation of the United States."

In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Aziz, who became familiar during the Gulf war as the diplomatic face of Iraq, dismissed as "baseless" any suggestions of an Iraqi role in the attacks on America.

He was equally scathing about reports that his country was behind the anthrax attacks. However, he said that Baghdad would not allow UN weapons inspectors to return to investigate the country's biological, chemical, missile and nuclear programmes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in