Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Russian air strikes in Syria: How Russia's media reported the news

Russian planes are believed to have performed two strikes in Syrian airspace

Rose Troup Buchanan
Thursday 01 October 2015 16:10 BST
Comments
The town of Rastan was reportedly hit by Russian strikes, as well as Talbiseh
The town of Rastan was reportedly hit by Russian strikes, as well as Talbiseh (AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Russian state media has reported Russia’s air strikes in Syrian territory in typical fashion.

The state television group Channel One reportedly ran almost uninterrupted coverage of the air strikes last night, continuing in greater detail on Thursday.

In the latest piece on their website, Channel One reported the military had “tried to be as open as possible”.

US officials may disagree. American authorities claimed they had just an hour to scramble their military jets out of Syria airspace prior to the first Russian strike.

Russia Today published a report documenting the “information warfare” from the Western press. The piece alleged social media was “flooded with ‘evidence’ of civilian casualties” that were “readily repeated by the Western mainstream media.”

Vladimir Putin also weighed in on the claims, branding news of civilian deaths “information attacks”.

Sputnik, a state owned and run news channel, also reported on the “distorted and false information” with a Kremlin spokesperson telling citizens to be “very, very careful” about what information they believed.

Don’t become a victim of perverse information,” Dmitry Peskov told reporters.

RT was also running a piece in which an Orthodox priest said his church was behind the strikes. “Russia’s role has always been in protecting peace and justice for all," Vsevolod Chaplin told reporters.

Meanwhile, the Moscow Times appeared initially to have bypassed the air strikes.

In the run-up to the strikes, the Daily Beast noted in addition to the movement of military support by the Russian state, top state news correspondents have also shifted from Ukraine to the Middle East.

The Russian Embassy to the UK appears to also be joining the "information war," tweeting back at British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond earlier on Thursday.

The deluge of reporting may be needed. When polled by independent organisation Levada centre, almost 70 per cent of Russians said they were against military aid to Bashar al-Assad.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in