Nato will send force of 300 to Baghdad
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.After months of haggling over Nato's role in Iraq, the alliance has answered a plea from the US by scraping together a force of 300 to help train Iraqi security forces.
Less than 100 of those sent by Nato to Baghdad will be military trainers with the rest providing protection and logistical backing.
Nato's mission to Iraq has been dogged by controversy since France threatened, earlier this year, to block any mission that involved a direct alliance deployment in the country.
Agreement was then reached on sending 60 troops and, after Mr Powell's intervention yesterday, the Netherlands, Hungary and Poland promised to send soldiers to boost the deployment to around 300. However 10 countries are not contributing to the force, either for political reasons or because they are militarily overstretched.
Colin Powell, the outgoing US Secretary of State, highlighted plans by George Bush to visit Nato headquarters early next year as evidence of his commitment to the transatlantic alliance.
However, the US also expressed its frustration that France, Germany Belgium, Spain and Greece were not allowing officers seconded to Nato's command in Mons, Belgium, or Norfolk, Virginia, to take part in Iraqi missions.
Mr Powell said that, when Nato officers from the countries were withdrawn, there was a "loss of credibility".
France's foreign minister, Michel Barnier, responded that "since the beginning, when there was a question of intervention in Iraq, we expressed our reserve.
"Neither today nor tomorrow will there be French soldiers in Iraq," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments