Iraq's Shia leader in new election demand
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The spiritual leader of Iraq's Shia majority demanded assurances yesterday that direct elections will be held by the end of the year - in defiance of America's desire to delay them.
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani said he would only accept the unelected interim government, which the US plans to hand power to on 30 June, if he is given assurances of direct elections by the United Nations.
His statement was seen as a way out of the impasse after he had condemned US plans to hand over to an unelected government. But it masked seething resentment among the Shia over the elections issue, and is still much sooner than the Americans want.
The American chief administrator in Iraq, Paul Bremer, has said he believes it will take 15 to 20 months to prepare for elections.
Long repressed under Saddam, the Shia majority believed his overthrow would finally give them their chance of power, and expected to win it in elections. But increasingly they see American reluctance to hold elections as dashing that hope.
Ayatollah Sistani's call brought vast crowds on to the streets. No government could rule without his approval. He backed down from his demand for immediate elections after a UN team reported it would be impossible before June.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments