Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Iran offers nuclear concessions on eve of crucial meeting

World Focus: Iran

David Usborne
Saturday 22 August 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Diplomats the United Nations and in Western capitals were cautiously hopeful last night that a new agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Iran on the oversight of its nuclear facilities may signal the start of a thaw in the long-running confrontation over its enrichment programmes.

Days before the planned release of a new IAEA report that is expected to be highly critical of the Iranian government for failing to co-operate with inspectors, Tehran has made two potentially significant concessions including a green light for them to resume visits to a heavy water reactor near the city of Arak.

Sources in Vienna, where the IAEA is based, also told news agencies that the Iranian authorities simultaneously agreed to amend working practices at its Natanz uranium-enrichment facility to give agency cameras a better view of what is happening on the centrifuge floor where the enrichment happens.

But an official in the Obama administration cautioned against excessive optimism. "Iran is still not in compliance with its IAEA obligations and is not providing... full and comprehensive co-operation," he said, on condition of anonymity.

At a key meeting on 2 September, the US, Britain, France and Germany are expected to urge Russia and China to agree to the possibility of yet another round of stringent UN sanctions. The new report from the IAEA will form the basis of those talks.

President Barack Obama has warned that he expects Iran, which is just coming out of the tumult of its contested presidential elections, to offer evidence by mid-September that it is indeed pursuing enrichment for energy-generating reasons alone, as it claims, and not with weaponisation in mind. If he is not satisfied, he will use a G20 summit in Pittsburgh on 24 September to demand new sanctions. "We must welcome every effort from Iran because we have been asking them to co-operate with the IAEA and they have not been doing so," one European diplomat said of the new gestures. Another diplomatic source was less sure of the significance. "Look at it in context. Iran stonewalls for a year and then allows access right before the IAEA is to issue its report," he said.

After coming to office, Mr Obama made clear overtures to Iran to repair relations on condition that it took steps to ending the nuclear dispute. While the confusion of the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has complicated that strategy severely, the White House still considers the dossier urgent, particularly because pressure may grow inside Israel to launch a military strike against the country.

Interpreting the intentions of Tehran remains a vexing exercise. Meanwhile, the new head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, Ali Akbar Salehi, is being seen by Western analysts as a moderate who might favour resolving the stand-off as soon as possible. Iran barred IAEA inspectors from the not-yet- completed Arak heavy water plant a year ago, insisting that it was for agricultural research and for the production of medical isotopes. Meanwhile, the IAEA had long complained that it was unable properly to use its cameras at Natanz.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in