Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Assad family names censored from report into Hariri killing

David Usborne
Saturday 22 October 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The report says senior Syrian and Lebanese security officials were directly involved in the killing of Hariri in February and planned it over many weeks. The missing names are of Asef Shawkat, President Bashar Assad's brother-in-law who is Syria's intelligence chief, and his brother, Maher Assad.

President George Bush called on the United Nations yesterday to convene a session as soon as possible to deal with the report. It "strongly suggests that the politically motivated assassination could not have taken place without Syrian involvement," Mr Bush said.

Detlev Mehlis, the UN investigator and author of the report, acknowledged some names had been struck from the final version, submitted on Thursday to the UN secretary general, Kofi Annan, and to the Security Council. He denied he had made the changes because of outside pressure.

With or without the changes, the report is highly flammable for President Assad and for Emile Lahoud, the pro-Syrian President of Lebanon. Mr Lahoud denied the report's assertion that he received a telephone call from a suspect just minutes before the car bomb that killedHariri and 20 other people.

"Even an initial reading of the report is deeply troubling," Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, said last night as she demanded that Syria be held accountable.

Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, who was in Alabama with Ms Rice, called the report, "an unpleasant story which the international community will take very seriously". Britain, the US and France will lead consideration of new sanctions on Syria in the Security Council when it meets next Tuesday.

Mr Mehlis writes of "converging evidence" to show the involvement of Lebanese and Syrian officials. He has been given an extension until December to continue his inquiry.

The decision to kill Hariri, it says, "could not have been taken without the approval of top-ranked Syrian security officials and could not have been further organised without the collusion of their counterparts in the Lebanese security services". The report also accuses Farouk Shara, Syria's Foreign Minister, of having lied in a letter sent to the investigating commission.

According to the report, Hariri may have sealed his fate when he tried to block a Damascus-backed amendment to Lebanon's constitution that allowed for an extension of Mr Lahoud's term of office. Hariri resigned as prime minister in protest after the amendment was passed.

Mr Shawkat and Maher Assad,witnesses said, talked about killing Hariri in talks begun in September last year in Damascus. It was from incriminating passages describing those meetings that the names were erased. Computer records suggest Mr Mehlis struck out the names either immediately after or during a meeting with Mr Annan in New York on Thursday. The prosecutor from Berlin said he had not realised the report would be released to the public and to leave the names there would have harmed the men's right to be presumed innocent until found guilty.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in