Killings by militants test Palestinian authority
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE newly installed Palestinian police faced a serious test yesterday when Islamic militants killed two Israeli soldiers and wounded two Jewish settlers inside the Gaza Strip.
Both Hamas, the Islamic Resistance Movement, and Islamic Jihad, a smaller militant group, claimed responsibility for the attacks, demonstrating that Islamic extremists remain determined to use violence to overturn the Gaza-Jericho agreement.
Palestinian commanders came under immediate pressure from Israel to round up the gunmen. However, the generals showed no immediate ability or willingness to take action.
The attacks coincided with the arrival in Gaza of Nabil Shaath, the chief Palestinian negotiator. Making his first visit to Gaza since 1964, Mr Shaath found himself embroiled in the first security crisis of the handover, and he carried out intensive negotiations with his Israeli counterparts to determine the next step.
Both sides were acutely aware that indecision could fuel new tension on Gaza's highly volatile streets, where thousands of Palestinian police now roam without any apparent sense of purpose.
'I am sorry the attacks happened,' said Mr Shaath, attempting to calm the atmosphere after emerging from the new Palestinian police headquarters in Gaza where he met General Nasser Youssef, head of the Palestinian police. 'We have to do our best to prevent and pre-empt the acts occurring. But I am not alarmed. The spirit in which the agreement is being applied is encouraging.'
General Youssef would not say what action was considered, saying: 'Hamas will not control the situation.' Earlier in the week the general said he would disarm the militants, but later clarified his comments saying there would be a new gun licensing system.
Although Israel reacted by closing off the Gaza Strip, Israeli commanders did not order their forces to pursue the attackers into Palestinian-controlled territory. Under new rules of engagement Israel maintains a right of hot pursuit. The attack against the soldiers took place about 1km inside the Gaza perimeter, where the Israeli army still has a checkpoint. The gunmen shot dead the two soldiers, then escaped back into the Palestinian area.
The second attack, against settlers, took place near the main settlement block of Gush Qatif.
The transfer of authority from Israeli forces to Palestinian police, under way for a week, had been carried out with relative calm, raising hopes that armed opponents had agreed to a truce.
However, the attacks were timed to cause maximum confusion, exposing the vulnerability of the Palestinian police who answer to no Palestinian authority as yet, and act in a power vacuum. Soundings in Gaza yesterday suggested the attacks were supported by many Palestinians, who remain highly sceptical about the agreement.
'Fantastic,' said Suhel Mohammed, 20, describing the killings. 'I hope the attacks continue until all the Israelis are gone. They are still close by in Gaza at the checkpoints and settlements.'
For Israelis the attacks appear to confirm their worst fears: that the new enclaves would be used as safe havens for the gunmen.
The anger of the Israeli right wing was spelt out yesterday by Benjamin Ben-Ellisar, a leading Likud member of the Knesset, who said: 'The agreement is against nature. How can a free and powerful nation like Israel try to strike a peaceful agreement with a snake, an Arafat, the PLO?'
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments