Iraq 'uses chemicals in attack'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Conservative MP Emma Nicholson asserted yesterday that Saddam Hussein has launched a chemical weapons attack on Shia Muslims in the southern marshes of Iraq, writes Charles Richards.
Ms Nicholson, a campaigner for the Marsh Arabs, said a senior doctor in a refugee camp on the Iraq- Iran border 'confirmed to me reports of a chemical weapons attack'.
The Tehran-based Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq said that on 29 September Iraqi troops fired chemical shells at villages in the Abu Zergi marshes north-west of Basra.
Ms Nicholson said that doctors working on the Iraq-Iran border had received similar reports from refugees fleeing the area. 'Patients have come across from the Iraqi side and have reported to them that there has indeed been a terrible chemical weapons assault,' she told the BBC. '(They said) nerve gas has been used, which means that you suffocate to death, some have survived and reached the safety of Iran, some civilians died.'
The Foreign Office said it was investigating the reports but suggested that the white clouds of gas that eyewitnesses said they saw could have been white phosphorus, which though unpleasant is not a proscribed substance.
Other Iraqi dissidents, none of whom has an interest in whitewashing Saddam Hussein, were sceptical about the reports on both technical and political grounds. They said none of their many sources had independent confirmation of the use of chemical weapons. And they argued that President Saddam was unlikely to have used them when he is seeking a lifting of sanctions at the 19 November review by the United Nations special committee.
That President Saddam has not hesitated to use chemical weapons against his own population in the past is not in question. Yet Iraq has also shown that it can discipline army commanders not to use them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments