Iraq insists it is keeping out of no-fly zones
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IRAQ reiterated its commitment to its self-declared ceasefire in the northern and southern no-fly zones yesterday, despite reports in the United States of three clashes in as many days.
The Pentagon, meanwhile, admitted that Iraqi radar had not been tracking a US Navy A-6 jet when the pilot bombed a military site near Nasiriyah, in the southern no-fly zone, on Saturday night. The pilot saw flashes in the sky and, thinking he was being fired on by anti-aircraft guns, dropped a 1,000lb laser-guided bomb.
An Iraqi Foreign Ministry spokesman denied reports that Iraqi air defences had fired on Saturday night on three American fighters over the southern no-fly zone. The spokesman said that no radars or air defences were turned on and insisted that Iraq was still observing the ceasefire declared on 19 January. He said the authorities were looking for the spot where US fighters were said to have fired a laser-guided bomb.
The Americans have said they are responding to Iraqi provocation. But it is far from clear who is cat and who is mouse in this series of encounters. The suspicion is growing in Baghdad that President Clinton is clinging to the coat-tails of his predecessor. One newspaper accused Bush supporters in the US defence establishment seeking to provoke a confrontation.
There is surprise and dismay in government circles that Mr Clinton has responded to Iraq's attempt to turn a new page in relations with the US by continuing the policy of his predecessor. Iraq is not a country where a local commander would wilfully ignore the very explicit instructions from the leadership not to turn on radar to track US patrols. Hence the Iraqi response that these reports were fabricated by the Pentagon, to draw the leadership into making some rash response.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments