Frink's 'New Man' deemed indecent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There were few more respectable figures in the arts world than the late Elisabeth Frink, the sculptress, yet in Hong Kong her work has been censored by the government's Obscene Articles Tribunal for indecency.
The tribunal tends to be sensitive to works of art depicting the unclad human body, but regularly ignores quite graphic and shocking depictions of violence. Thus Dame Elisabeth's work has been deemed to fall into "Class II", a category embracing "violence, depravity and repulsiveness".
Yet it is common to see children clutching comics full of severed heads and other violent depictions, which do not seem to warrant the same treatment.
The problem arises over the life-size bronze statue of a nude man called New Man. It is very much in Dame Elisabeth's rather austere style. There is nothing erotic about it, unlessa flaccid penis on a nude man is automatically considered erotic. The offending member is now delicately covered.
The statue stands in a commercial development owned by Woo Po-shing, a rich art collector, who bought it in a Christie's London auction. Trouble began when a visitor reported New Man to the authorities. Mr Woo asked the Obscene Articles Tribunal to make a ruling.
Oscar Ho, Hong Kong Arts Centre's director, has described the hearing as a "terrifying day for arts in Hong Kong".
Efforts yesterday to get any official to explain why the work had been declared indecent proved fruitless. It is clear, however, that the decision has caused embarrassment in upper echelons of government, where it is being made known that the indecency order's enforcement is not considered a priority.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments