Force may no longer be needed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain and other countries that were planning to send troops to Zaire are to meet in Germany on Wednesday to discuss if an international force is still required in the region.
The United States was planning to send 1,000, France 1,000 and the British at least a battalion.
The discovery that a British firm may have been defying a United Nations embargo and supplying large quantities of arms and ammunition to the former Rwandan government during and after the genocide in 1994 of a million of its people, mostly Tutsis and moderate Hutus, may cause severe embarrassment. With aid workers risking their lives in the area, an investigation of the alleged arms trade has been demanded by opposition politicians in Britain.
However, in Zaire itself the immediate crisis appears to have eased. By the time troops may have been ready to deploy next week, more than half the 1.1 million Rwandan refugees in eastern Zaire could have returned home voluntarily. Raymond Chretien, the UN special envoy, said a military force was still needed. But South Africa's Deputy President, Thabo Mbeki, said that the mission's terms needed to be changed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments