Sweet victory for British chocolate in EU dispute
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Spain and Italy were told yesterday that they cannot label some of Britain's best-known confectionery bars "chocolate substitute" when a 30-year wrangle ended in victory for the UK.
The Spanish and Italian governments were found guilty by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg of breaching EU trade laws by restricting the marketing of British chocolate.
In taste tests in France and Belgium, British chocolate bars have sometimes won when pitted against brands manufactured abroad. But, with up to 5 per cent vegetable fat content instead of the pure cocoa butter common elsewhere in the EU, British chocolate has long been derided on the Continent.
The dispute dates from Britain's accession to the EEC in 1973. Spain and Italy had been defying an agreement in 2000 that a small amount of vegetable fat was acceptable.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments