Religious heritage of Kosovo 'left in ruins'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Harvard specialist testifying yesterday at the trial of the former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic said a third of Muslim holy sites in Kosovo had been destroyed in the war.
Andras Riedlmayer, a cultural historian, said scores of mosques, Islamic libraries, theology schools and mausoleums were dynamited, shelled, hit with gunfire or set alight.
Mr Riedlmayer said he visited 140 sites in Kosovo after the conflict in the Serbian province ended in 1999, using the information for his study of holy places, The Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Kosovo.
His report states: "In some cases, such attacks were accompanied by anti-Albanian or pro-Serb graffiti written on the mosque walls or inside the mihrab (prayer area) and vandalism directed at religious scripture."
Mr Riedlmayer said: "Our documentation showed that more than one-third were destroyed or damaged, and the evidence shows this happened in 1998-1999 during some kind of conflict. I will leave the conclusions to others."
He found no evidence was found that the bombing campaign by Nato had damaged any important architecture.
Mr Milosevic rejected the report as subjective, saying it had been written under Nato orders and he accused Mr Riedlmayer, an American, of bias.(AP)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments