Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Nato chief was told of bribe

Thursday 23 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Brussels (AFP) - Willy Claes's future as secretary-general of Nato was in doubt yesterday as a 1988 bribery scandal widened to implicate both him and the Belgian Foreign Minister, Frank Vandenbrouke.

Mr Claes first denied then admitted that he was told at a meeting in 1989 that the Italian helicopter group Agusta had offered 50m francs (£1.1m) for his party's funds only weeks after Agusta had been awarded a $225m Belgian army contract for 46 helicopters.

On Tuesday he assured Nato ambassadors that he had not acted in any way improperly in connection with the affair, in which three former officials of his Flemish Socialist Party (SP) face bribery charges.

Etienne Mange, the head of the Belgian post office and former SP treasurer, said yesterday that he had told Mr Claes, Mr Vandenbrouke and Louis Tobback, then Interior Minister, of the Agusta offer. Although nobody has suggested Mr Claes knew of the bribery attempt, his failure to disclose what he was told raises questions about his judgement.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in