Kremlinology: So what is 'Prime Minister' Putin playing at now?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The old Russian art of Kremlinology – trying to work out what is happening in a deliberately opaque system of government – is back. Only this time it's called Putinology.
As Vladimir Putin has consolidated his power in Russia, a familiar guessing game of "who's in and who's out" has returned, based on TV appearances, placement next to the president at prominent events, and the occasional cryptic remark by the man himself. Even when Mr Putin has been explicit, insisting that he would not seek to change the constitution and permit himself a third term as president next spring, the punditocracy assumed he meant something else.
Gradually he has been taken at his word, however, and the goal has shifted to trying to decipher who should be seen as his anointed successor. Three weeks ago the Prime Minister, Mikhail Fradkov, suddenly "resigned", and Mr Putin, as if from thin air, chose Viktor Zubkov, an ageing grey bureaucrat. Could he really be in line to be the next president?
Equally suddenly, Mr Putin suggested last week that he would run for the Duma, or parliament, and did not rule out becoming Prime Minister. His remarks were made at the annual conference of United Russia – a Kremlin-backed political party whose slogan for the December parliamentary elections is "Putin's plan is Russia's victory" – and are unlikely to have been off the cuff.
It all seems to make sense: Mr Zubkov's appointment looks very much like the first link in a chain designed to lead to Mr Putin in a newly powerful prime ministerial role, with a possible return to the presidency in 2012, or perhaps earlier if Mr Zubkov "decides" to step aside.
In any case, Mr Putin's statement, and his addition that he hopes the new president is someone he could "work as a pair" with, demonstrate that while he might baulk at changing the constitution in letter, he's happy to trample it in spirit. It is not clear why such a convoluted process is needed when the Duma, and most Russians, would have been happy to tear up the constitution and simply let him stay on for a third term.
Russian history, however, teaches that Mr Zubkov, or whoever the new president turns out to be, should not be written off. Lenin was a marginalised fanatic when he showed up in St Petersburg in April 1917; Stalin was described as a "grey blur. Mr Putin himself, when thrust into the prime minister's job in 1999 by an ailing Boris Yeltsin, was seen as a comically dull bureaucrat who wouldn't stay in the limelight for long. How wrong that turned out to be.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments