Iraq invasion had no legal mandate, says Dutch panel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Dutch government supported the invasion of Iraq despite it having no legal backing under the law of the Netherlands, a long-awaited investigation concluded yesterday.
The report also said that Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende had little to do with planning the Netherlands' participation in the war.
The Netherlands gave political support to the US-led invasion, allowed the use of its logistics facilities and some US troops passed through the Netherlands on their way to join the invasion.
"The United Nations Security Council resolution on Iraq from the 1990s did not give a mandate to the US-British military intervention in 2003," the Dutch Committee of Inquiry on Iraq said in its 550-page report.
The Netherlands gave political support to the war because of a risk that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, and to support its Nato allies, the US and Britain, who led the invasion, the committee said.
The report said the Dutch government did not adequately inform parliament in 2002 and 2003 about a US request that it support planning for the invasion, and about the timing of Dutch logistical support for the invasion.
In an initial response, Mr Balkenende dismissed the committee's most critical conclusions, saying there were different opinions about the legal mandate for the invasion.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments