Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hearsay is not a breach of human rights says Council of Europe

 

Lewis Smith
Friday 16 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Hearsay evidence can continue to be heard in the UK's criminal courts without breaching defendants' human rights, provided adequate "counterbalances" are in place, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled.

Senior judges in the UK had earlier warned that banning hearsay evidence because of human rights law would force a radical re-write of the criminal justice system. The European Convention on Human Rights guarantees "the right to examine witnesses against [defendants] or have them examined".

The ruling by the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg means that evidence from witnesses can still be presented to a court even if the defence has no opportunity to challenge them in person, such as when a witness has died before a trial has taken place.

The judges reached their decision while considering the cases of Imad Al-Khawaja, convicted of indecent assault, and Ali Tahery, jailed for stabbing a man. In Al-Khawaja's case they agreed there had been sufficient counterbalances, but they awarded Mr Tahery £15,000 after deciding his trial had been unfair because it lacked them.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in