French appeals court overturns manslaughter case against Continental Airlines over Concorde crash that killed 113
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A French appeals court has overturned a manslaughter conviction against Continental Airlines for the July 2000 crash of an Air France Concorde that killed 113 people.
The ruling follows a case in 2010 where a French court convicted Continental Airlines Inc and one of its mechanics for the crash.
The court also imposed around $2.7 million in damages and fines on the carrier.
Investigators had claimed that a titanium strip that had fallen from a Continental airliner, and was left on the runway at Charles de Gaulle airport, had caused the crash.
A mechanic, John Taylor, was given a 15-month suspended prison sentence over the crash.
Continental said the initial court decision was absurd and launched an appeal.
The Air France Concorde burst into flames shortly after take-off in 2000 and the jet slammed into a hotel nearby killing all 109 people aboard and four on the ground.
The majority of the passengers were German tourists heading to New York to join a Caribbean cruise.
The US airline had always argued that Concorde caught fire before it hit the metal strip, and said they were being used as a scapegoat in order to protect France's airline industry.
Megan McCarthy, a spokeswoman for Chicago-based United Continental Holdings, told the BBC the firm supported the court's decision that Continental was not to blame.
"We have long maintained that neither Continental nor its employees were responsible for this tragic event and are satisfied that this verdict was overturned," she said in a written statement.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments