France scraps law making 'regular' visits to jihadi websites an offence
Constitutional council rules law infringe unnecessary and disproportionately on freedom of communication
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A French law that banned people from regularly visiting jihadist websites, which encourage or praise “acts of terrorism”, has been ruled unconstitutional.
The constitutional council, a top judicial body, has overturned the law which was brought in last June after a terrorist attack by jihadist militants killed 130 people in Paris in November 2015.
In a ruling, the 10-members of the constitutional council vetoed the law, which would imposed a two-year prison sentence and a €30,000 (£25,575) fine for anyone consulting jihadist websites regularly on the basis it infringed unnecessarily and disproportionately on freedom of communication.
In a statement, the council said that French law enforcement agencies had enough resources to tackle terrorism by monitoring websites, which incited militancy, and people who clearly had "a terrorist intention" without the need for this new law.
The case was brought before the constitutional council by a lawyer, whose client was found guilty of the offence and was sentenced for two-years by a tribunal in Anger.
The lawyer decried the new law as “very vague” and warned it could lead to prosecutions of a large number of people, who were being asked to prove their good faith.
The man accused of the offence was also sentenced for other offences and it is unclear how the ruling will affect his prison term.
The decision comes as a 16-year-old girl was among four suspects arrested in Montpellier, south of France, for allegedly planning a new terror attack in “a tourist area” of Paris after explosives and bomb-making material were found in a man’s home.
The 16-year-old girl and her 20-year-old boyfriend, both in custody, were known from the French authorities for their alleged connection with radical Islam.
France has been under a state of emergency since the horrific attack in November 2015 and has since seen another attack last July, which killed 86 people in Nice during national day celebrations.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments