Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cranberries nanny awarded £1,000 but 'imprisonment' claims rejected

Kieran McDaid
Thursday 29 April 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Cranberries singer Dolores O'Riordan and her husband Don Burton were ordered yesterday to pay Joy Fahy, their former nanny, €1,500 (£1,050) for loss of some of her possessions. But they were cleared of allegations that Mr Burton had falsely imprisoned the nanny or breached a contract with her.

Judge Jonathan Quirke told Dublin High Court he was satisfied some of Ms Fahy's belongings had been mislaid at the couple's mansion in Co Limerick after her work ended.

But he said Ms Fahy, 34, had failed to prove that Mr Burton had falsely imprisoned her, and that the couple had breached a contract. The judge said there were obvious conflicts in the testimony by Ms O'Riordan and her husband compared with that of Ms Fahy. But he added: "The fact that the witnesses have different recollections of events that occurred five years ago is not particularly surprising. This does not mean that they are necessarily being dishonest." Ms Fahy had told the court the clothes she left at their home had nt been returned, complaints about expenses and irregular hours had been ignored and she was expected to work in difficult conditions.

The former nanny sought €12,700 (£9,000), a Cherokee Jeep and the deposit for an apartment, which she claims were promised to her if her one-year verbal contract was terminated. Mr Justice Quirke said Ms Fahy had failed to advance evidence for any of the allegations except for the loss of her personal belongings.

Ms O'Riordan said after the hearing that she wished to put the case behind her. Ms Fahy said: "I am relieved it's all over and that sometimes the little guy can win." Court costs will be decided tomorrow.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in