Concern grows in US over GM food
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE US Agriculture Secretary, Dan Glickman, appealed to corporations pioneering genetically modified (GM) products yesterday to show more sensitivity towards the worries of farmers and consumers. His remarks are seen as acknowledging a growing concern in the American public about the safety of GM food.
Speaking to an audience at the US National Press Club in Washington, he said: "Biotechnology companies must understand and respect the role of the arm's length regulator, the farmer and the consumer."
Mr Glickman called for an independent scientific review of his department's procedures for approving biotechnology products. The purpose of the review, he said, would be to "ensure that ... our scientists have the best information and tools to ensure our regulatory capabilities continue to evolve along with advances in the new technology".
The Agriculture Secretary also pledged "to strengthen biotechnology guidelines to ensure we can stay on top of any unforeseen adverse effects after initial market approval". He said he was setting up regional monitoring centres to that end.
Although he was upbeat on the safety and benefits of biotechnology, his mention of "unforeseen adverse effects" was a signal departure for the US administration, which has steered clear of suggesting that biotechnological advances might not be safe.
Mr Glickman was speaking after the World Trade Organisation had announced the penalties that the US would be permitted to levy on the EU in retaliation for its ban on US beef. Far from exulting, he reiterated the need for US regulators and producers to keep each other "at arm's length".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments