Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clinton near deal on gay soldiers: Homosexuals likely to be allowed to serve if they promise not to tell QBY: RUPERT CORNWELL in Washington

Wednesday 14 July 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE moment of truth in the emotive, politically perilous controversy over homosexuals in the military is at hand for President Clinton. In essence, he must either endorse a conservative Pentagon proposal that will infuriate gay rights advocates, or risk confrontation with both his military chiefs and the Senate majority opposed to sweeping changes in the current rules.

Today is the deadline for Les Aspin, the Defense Secretary, to present his recommendations. Mr Clinton's search for a compromise may hold up his own decision for a day or two. But one thing is clear: there is next to no chance that he will keep his promise to lift the ban and allow homosexuals in the armed services without restriction.

Instead all the signs point to a version of the 'Don't ask, Don't tell' approach which is the most that the Joint Chiefs, and important congressmen, are prepared to stomach. Gays and lesbians would be allowed to serve, but only on condition they kept their sexual preference a secret.

According to Pentagon officials, the main concession would be a change in the language of current military regulations. In future these would stipulate that 'homosexual conduct', as opposed to 'homosexuality', was incompatible with service. But while screening of recruits and witch-hunts of suspects would stop, declarations of homosexuality would still be forbidden. So too would homosexual behaviour, both on and off base.

This new formulation has been presented to gay-rights leaders. Their reaction was predictably angry; the changes, according to Thomas Stoddart, head of the Campaign for Military Service group, were merely cosmetic, and would amount to 'a capitulation to bigotry and political expediency'.

Some gay advocates cling to the hope that Mr Clinton will insist on further changes, and undoubtedly he would like to. But to demand a more liberal policy would risk antagonising conservative Democrats at the very moment he needs his party's undivided support for final passage of his deficit-cutting budget package, on which congressmen begin negotiations today.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in