Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Foetuses 'understand' when they will not survive, says Australian senator

Liberal senator Chris Back said they have a 'capacity' to know when they might not survive post-foetal life

Antonia Molloy
Thursday 25 September 2014 16:56 BST
Comments
Liberal senator Chris Back
Liberal senator Chris Back (Parliament of Australia )

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An Australian senator has said that some miscarriages are caused by foetuses that have an inherent understanding that they will not survive outside of the womb.

Liberal senator Chris Back made the comments to the Senate during a debate over a bill that proposes to stop women receiving Medicare funds to pay for gender-selective abortions, The Guardian reported.

“Foetuses do have the capacity to somehow understand in circumstances that they might not survive in post-foetal life,” Back said.

“We know that naturally-occurring miscarrying as it’s called in humans, or abortion in animals, does occur because of some innate capacity or ability of the foetus to understand that it’s not going to survive post-natal life.”

Back made the comments in favour of the controversial bill, which has been criticised for limiting a woman’s right to choose.

Back, who previously practised as a vet, also said that the female hormones develop first in the embryonic stage of foetal development.

“Maleness is actually suppressed femaleness,” he said.

Labour senator Sue Lines said that passing the bill would be the first step on the road to making abortion more difficult to access.

And fellow Labour senator Claire Moore said that the bill failed to fully address the issue.

“If you are concerned about the issue of abortion in Australia, take up the debate on those issues, do not hide behind putting a guilt trip on women about possible choices they make and hiding behind an argument that is based on the very document created to ensure women are empowered,” she said.

The bill was not voted on and will be discussed by the Senate again in 2015.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in