Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Plans to demolish Christian-majority slums in Islamabad put on hold by Supreme Court

'This sort of anti-people, anti-minority authoritarian attitude has no place in the 21st century'

Serina Sandhu
Monday 14 December 2015 09:59 GMT
Comments
Human rights activists slammed Islamabad authorities after court documents showed the Pakistani capital's development body had cracked down on illegal slums because it feared their growing Christian population would threaten the city's Muslim majority
Human rights activists slammed Islamabad authorities after court documents showed the Pakistani capital's development body had cracked down on illegal slums because it feared their growing Christian population would threaten the city's Muslim majority (AAMIR QURESHI/AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Plans to destroy a slum in Islamabad, which is largely occupied by Christians, have been postponed by the Supreme Court.

It comes after the Awami Workers Party (AWP) submitted a petition to the Court in August, challenging the Capital Development Authority’s (CDA) plans to demolish the areas across the Pakistani capital.

In a press conference at the time, the AWP “called for an immediate halt to the ongoing eviction drive of the CDA in Islamabad, an immediate resettlement of all the former residents of the demolished I-11 katchi abadi [slum] and demanded that those who carried out the violent, brutal and unlawful operation in I-11 be brought to justice”.

Al Jazeera reported the court issued the stay order against the plans last week and ordered the CDA, which has been targeting illegal slums in the capital since 2014, to justify its next planned demolition in writing.

The CDA's reply read: “Most of these katchi abadies [slums] are under the occupation of the Christian community.”

“It seems this pace of occupation of land by Christian community may increase. Removal of katchi abadies is very urgent to provide [a] better environment to the citizen[s] of Islamabad and to protect the beauty of Islam.”

The response sparked outrage among activists.

Ammar Rashid, secretary of the Awami Workers Party, told Morning Star News: “The CDA’s reply is proof of the deeply prejudicial mindset that prevails in the CDA with regard to working classes and minorities, whom they regard with utter contempt.”

“This sort of anti-people, anti-minority authoritarian attitude has no place in the 21st century and needs to be relegated to the dustbin of dictatorial history that it emerged from."

"Islamabad as the national capital belongs to all of Pakistan’s citizens, not bureaucrats of the CDA.”

Ramzan Sajid, a CDA spokesperson, told Al Jazeera: “This community is part of Islamabad and we ensure that we look after their places of worship and their religious events. I can’t comment on the SC [Supreme Court] reply because that is in court now, but we appreciate the community and its effort and our reply has been taken out of context by some.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in