Rebuilding of missile site by North Korea will be key test for Trump after Hanoi summit failure
Analysis: Collapse of talks has strengthened hands of US hawks, writes Kim Sengupta
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
The speed with which Kim Jong-un ordered the reconstruction of the Tongchang-ri rocket launching site after the failure of his talks with Donald Trump demonstrated a calculated move designed to test the US president.
Although the restoration does not breach any pledge made by North Korea about suspending missile flight-testing, it is a very overt message that Pyongyang has the ability to produce and launch effective weapons, and that these will not be given up unless the US is prepared to pay a suitably high price.
One now has to watch what Pyongyang does after the test stand is rebuilt. Satellite images show that efforts have been made to restore a “transfer building”, a mobile structure used to place a rocket to a launch tower, and there are also signs that the launch tower itself has been rebuilt.
Tongchang-ri has, in the past, been used to launch two satellite-bearing rockets and the technology has been valuable in building missiles. Any sign that the site is being prepared for missile test-firing would put great pressure on Trump to take action.
The Washington-based think tank, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), which obtained and analysed the images of the site development, concluded that Pyongyang’s actions were “deliberate and purposeful” and intended “to demonstrate resolve in the face of US rejection” of the proposals Kim Jong-un had made at Hanoi.
An overly confrontational stance by North Korea would, however, give senior figures in the US administration, who have been sceptical of the talk process from the beginning, ammunition to press for punitive action.
John Bolton, Trump’s national security advisor, has been the leading hawk on this issue. He had suggested that Kim Jong-un follows the “Libyan model” of denuclearisation under which Col Muammar Gaddafi gave up his nuclear arsenal to be allowed back into the international fold. Eight years later, of course, Nato bombing led to the overthrow, capture and lynching of the Libyan leader by rebels.
Bolton’s suggestions led to howls of outrage in Pyongyang and Trump appeared to distance himself from his national security advisor. But the collapse of the Hanoi summit has strengthened the hands of the sceptics – and the news about the launch site has added to that.
Bolton threatened further punishment for North Korea if it did not give up its nuclear weapons. “If they are not willing to do it ... They are not going to get relief from the crushing economic sanctions that have been imposed on them and we’ll look at ramping those sanctions up in fact”, he declared.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments