India’s opposition vows to roll out universal basic income for the poor if it wins election

‘No other country has introduced such a scheme,’ Rahul Gandhi tells crowd

Adam Withnall
Delhi
Tuesday 29 January 2019 14:06 GMT
Comments
File: Rahul Gandhi, president of India's main opposition Congress party, speaks at a news conference
File: Rahul Gandhi, president of India's main opposition Congress party, speaks at a news conference (Reuters)

India’s main opposition Congress party has offered to roll out a means-tested universal basic income if it wins the country’s fast-approaching general election.

Congress Party leader Rahul Gandhi described the scheme as “the first of its kind in the world”. “We have decided that every poor person in India would be guaranteed a minimum income after the Congress forms the government in 2019,” he said, addressing a farmers’ rally in the central state of Chhattisgarh.

“No one will go hungry in India, no one will remain poor,” he said. The announcement was light on details, but Mr Gandhi referred to the scheme as a “minimum income guarantee for every poor person”, and that “the poor will get a minimum income directly into their bank”.

Congress’s announcement came on Monday, days before Narendra Modi’s ruing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was set to issue its last fiscal budget before a national election that must take place by the end of May.

The BJP is itself heavily predicted to issue a string of expensive, populist policies aimed at winning votes. They are expected to include relief measures for farmers, whose mass protests badly dented Mr Modi’s air of invincibility before a set of poor state election results late last year.

There have been rumours that the BJP may even have been considering its own scheme for a form of universal basic income. Nonetheless, the ruling party was quick to dismiss Congress’s announcement as unrealistic.

“Where will the money come from? He’s promising the moon to fool the people,” said Gopal Krishna Agarwal, a party spokesperson.

The president of the third-largest party, Mayawati Prabhu Das, most commonly referred to as Mayawati, urged voters not to believe the sweeping promises of either major party.

She compared Mr Gandhi’s announcement to that of Mr Modi before he swept to victory in 2014, when he promised to deliver Rs 1.5m (£16,000) into the bank account of every citizen by clawing back black money held in foreign bank accounts.

BJP officials have since argued that this was done indirectly through policies to boost the economy and create jobs, though Mr Modi’s efforts to clamp down on the black economy have provided little to no return.

“Is this [Congress’s] promise another cruel joke?” Mayawati asked, saying people wanted a party that worked “rather than making tall claims and promises”.

A government economic adviser, quoted anonymously by Reuters, admitted Mr Gandhi’s promise showed an element of “competitive populism” among politicians. Economists are concerned that whoever wins in the spring, India may breach goals to rein in its fiscal deficit.

Former Congress finance minister P Chidambaram insisted the party could find the resources to implement the promise. “The poor of India have the first charge on the resources of the country,” he said.

Congress said it could divert funds from an expensive programme of subsidies which, it argued, failed to reach the right people. India’s 2018-19 food subsidy bill alone was estimated at 1.7 trillion rupees, roughly 7 per cent of total federal spending.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

The idea of providing a universal basic income is gaining traction in smaller, wealthier countries such as Finland and France. But while India has had rapid economic growth, it is still home to one in three of the world’s extreme poor.

Luke Martinelli, research associate at the Institute for Policy Research at Bath University, told Reuters the Congress move was significant, although not quite offering universal coverage.

“A means tested guaranteed income for the poorest is very different from a universal basic income per se,” he said. “Having said that, obviously, in terms of income security there are some significant overlaps and this will be treated with enthusiasm, I’m sure, by the basic income community.”

Additional reporting by agencies

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in