Daniel Machover: There’s no doubt that international law protects these office holders
Comment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The crimes that fall fully under universal jurisdiction in England and Wales are torture, hostage taking and war crimes committed in an international armed conflict.
A wide number of people can also be prosecuted for genocide, war crimes in internal armed conflicts and crimes against humanity, but suspects generally need to live here or have a close connection here.
For all these crimes, at present the law enables a victim to apply to a district judge to issue an arrest warrant, but it then requires Attorney-General consent for there to be charges. If this person has got advice about the risk of arrest that suggests they are worried there is evidence to support criminal charges against him.
This is not the end of diplomacy. There’s a case known as the Belgian Congo ruling that said it is right, even in the worst cases, that certain top offices have immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of national courts, otherwise international diplomacy would grind to a halt. For a serving president, prime minister and foreign minister there’s no doubt that international law protects these office holders. I can categorically say we could not get an arrest warrant. If somebody came to me with good evidence I would say: you have to wait until he or she is out of office, unless you can take the case to the International Criminal Court, where this immunity does not apply, hence the arrest warrant against President Bashir of Sudan following the referral of the Darfur situation to the ICC by the UN Security Council (Resolution 1593, 31 March 2005).
There’s pressure from the US and Israel to change the law. There’s no legal pressure, it’s political pressure because it’s embarrassing for the UK. What we find alarming is there’s no discussion of the fact that the law is perfectly capable of weeding out false cases.
Daniel Machover specialises in international human rights law at Hickman & Rose solicitors
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments