More than 3,000 sign up to die in South Korean palliative care trial
Hospitals have allowed patients to stop receiving treatment three months before palliative care becomes legally into force next year
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than 3,000 have signed up for South Korea’s palliative care trial.
According to data by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, hospitals have received thousands of requests from terminal ill patients to sign up for the die with dignity programme.
South Korea’s National Assembly passed the law to stop prolonging terminally ill patient’s lives, if requested, in January of last year but it won’t come into force until February 2018.
However, hospitals allowed patients to stop receiving treatment before it is legal in a three month trial period.
Thousands have signed necessary documents saying they would opt to stop receiving medical treatment in a three-month trial period that began in October.
During the trial doctors across 13 hospitals discussed end-of-life care with patients or their family members.
South Korea’s Supreme Court recognised that prolonging a terminally ill comatose patient’s right to die as a violation of an individual’s basic dignity in 2009.
It ordered a hospital to remove her respirator, noting that it was wrong to continue treatment just to prolong life without hope of recovery.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments