Appeals court raps OJ judge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Los Angeles (AP) - A US appeals court yesterday ordered the OJ Simpson trial judge to abandon his planned jury instruction about a key prosecution witness or further explain his decision to a higher court.
The 2nd District Court of Appeals gave prosecutors a partial victory in their attempt to throw out Judge Lance Ito's instruction that jurors could base Detective Mark Fuhrman's credibility on his "unavailability" for more cross-examination.
Mr Fuhrman was questioned by defence lawyers earlier this week, outside the jury's presence, after evidence was presented that contradicted his previous testimony. He also was asked whether he placed a bloody glove at Mr Simpson's estate to make it appear the former American-football star killed his ex-wife and her friend.
Mr Fuhrman refused to answer the questions, citing his right against self-incrimination. The defence claims Fuhrman is a liar and a racist who tried to make Mr Simpson appear guilty of the murders.
On Thursday Mr Ito said he would tell jurors Mr Fuhrman was unavailable to return to testify and they could consider that in determining his credibility. The judge said, however, that he would not mention that Mr Fuhrman had invoked his constitutional privilege when questioned by defence lawyers. Prosecutors argued that such a statement would leave the wrong impression.
The appeals-court order said: "... the proposed instruction regarding the unavailability of former Detective Fuhrman is not to be given."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments